Latvian Parliament Votes to Withdraw from Istanbul Convention
In a controversial decision, the Latvian Parliament voted on whether the country should withdraw from the Istanbul Convention, an international treaty aimed at preventing violence against women. Out of the total votes, 56 lawmakers supported withdrawal, 32 voted to remain in the treaty, and two abstained.
In a controversial decision, the Latvian Parliament voted on whether the country should withdraw from the Istanbul Convention, an international treaty aimed at preventing violence against women. Out of the total votes, 56 lawmakers supported withdrawal, 32 voted to remain in the treaty, and two abstained.
The decision comes just one year after Latvia ratified the convention in 2024. If finalized, Latvia would become the first European Union member state to leave the Istanbul Convention. However, the motion still requires the signature of President Edgars Rinkevics, who has indicated that he does not oppose it but may not block a parliamentary decision.
The convention sets standards for supporting women who are victims of violence, including domestic abuse. The withdrawal motion was supported by an alliance of opposition lawmakers and members of the governing coalition. Ultra-conservative groups have criticized the treaty, claiming it promotes “gender ideology” and has negative effects on children.
Prime Minister Evika Silina, whose coalition came to power in 2023 promising to ratify the treaty, condemned the withdrawal efforts. She stated on social media, “Those brave enough to seek help now see their experiences being used as political tools. This is cruel.”
The decision has exposed tensions within the coalition ahead of the next parliamentary elections scheduled for fall 2026.
International women’s rights organizations have warned that Latvia’s withdrawal could undermine human rights movements in Europe and Central Asia.
Protests were held in Riga, with around 5,000 people demonstrating against the withdrawal and approximately 20 supporting it.
The move has sparked renewed debate across Europe about measures to prevent violence against women and the protection of international agreements.